Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Peter Gordon. The two positions at Davos may uncover an archetypal tension in philosophical thought. Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos By Peter E. Gordon (Harvard University Press, pp., $) I. The Swiss town of Davos was. Peter Gordon’s book, Continental Divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos, is due out this month. It looks promising–plus Harvard UP tells us all that.
|Published (Last):||22 November 2004|
|PDF File Size:||4.74 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||4.13 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Get to Know Us. There was a total of 56 individual lectures that year by various distinguished speakers, several of them delivered by Cassirer and Heidegger.
Here is, perhaps, a place to disagree with Gordon’s assessment. Cassirer was forced to leave Germany and ultimately settled in the United States, Inevitably, the debate at Davos became politicized in philosophical memory. They were arguably heideggeg most important thinkers in Europe, and their exchange touched upon the most urgent questions in the history of philosophy: They were arguably the most important thinkers in Europe, and their exchange touched upon the most urgent questions in the history of philosophy: You are commenting using your Twitter account.
Gordon dissects the content of that debate in his fourth and longest chapter in a rich and skillful analysis. Heideger Frankfurter Zeitung would write at the time that it “was felt to be not merely an academic quarrel between professors but a caszirer of representatives of two epochs.
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Continental Divide is a fine book both as intellectual history and as philosophy.
Continental Divide — Peter E. Gordon | Harvard University Press
In Marchphilosophers Martin Heidegger — and Ernst Cassirer — met in Davos, Switzerland for a public series of individual lectures and for a discussion and debate. Forged from a partnership between a university press and a library, Project MUSE is a trusted part of the academic and scholarly community it serves.
Mann’s philosophical novel also was set in Davos. Many on the next generation of European philosophers were interested spectators at the debate. Here, in a reconstruction at once historical and philosophical, Peter Gordon reexamines the conversation, its origins and its aftermath, resuscitating an event that has become entombed in its own mythology.
Gordon states that he began the study with a qualified partial admiration for Heidegger but became increasingly sympathetic towards Cassirer as the study proceeded.
Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. The Myth of the State. Their disagreement can be understood only if we appreciate their casskrer point of departure as thinkers of the German interwar crisis, an era of rebellion that touched all of the major philosophical movements of the day—life-philosophy, philosophical anthropology, neo-Kantianism, phenomenology, and existentialism.
Customers who viewed this item also viewed. Without cookies your experience may not be seamless. He discusses the thought of Cassirer and Heidegger heideger the years that led up hejdegger the debate, and their writings in the years which followed.
Over the last eighty years the Davos encounter has acquired an allegorical significance, as if it marked an ultimate and irreparable rupture in twentieth-century Continental thought.
He sets the stage for the discussion by giving the broad philosophical background that produced it. Explore the Home Gift Guide.
Would you like to tell us about a lower price? Gordon argues that philosophical disagreements have meaning in their own right and are not mere metaphors or fronts for politics. This debate has achieved legendary status in the history of contemporary thought and is regarded as opening an cssirer between those who base philosophy on scientific reason, and the human power of reflection, and those who are haunted by the unthinkable, the unsaid, and the unsayable The book displays a rare combination of historical and philosophical insight.
See and discover other items: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davosdeals directly with this encounter — with its content, its setting, its antecedents, consequences, and implications. An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture.
What is human finitude? There’s a problem loading this menu right now.
Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos
Since the task of intellectual history is to situate ideas in their broader historical context, the discipline confronts the intractable problem of just what counts as context. The issues and positions of both philosophers continue to be discussed. Heidegger agreed that davoss this question of the going-beyond of finitude, there lies a quite central problem.
In the first two chapters, Gordon relates the disputation to its philosophical and social context. Despite their movements away from scientific paradigms, Cassirer toward [End Page ] culture and