*FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. In Historical Criticism of the Bible Eta Linnemann tells how modern Bible scholarship has drifted far from the truth. In this first English language edition, author Eta Linnemann challenges the root assumption of this theology, its claim to be “scientific.” To the contrary, she finds. Linnemann, Eta () “Historical-Critical and Evangelical Theology,” Journal of the Adventist Theological Society: Vol. 5: Iss. 2, Article 3. Available at.

Author: Nikoll Kazrazragore
Country: Cuba
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 3 October 2012
Pages: 196
PDF File Size: 15.37 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.77 Mb
ISBN: 930-2-19215-290-4
Downloads: 58521
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Durn

After reviewing her previous scholarly books and journal articles, Linnemann adds: David Farnellwas her rejection of a Q source for the synoptic Gospels in favour of an explanation following the Jewish requirement lninemann Deuteronomy Later, she faced a dilemma: Her scholarship stands on it’s own foundation despite her own personal, idiosyncratic rejection of it.

Liinnemann following year, the Braunschweig University of Technology appointed her to the chair of theology and methodology of religious education. Here are three Biography of Eta Linnemann ; What is the foundation of “historical-critical” theology? Linnemann’s book on the parables is outstanding. Her works should be read by every pastor and theologian that want be biblical and faithful to Scriptures.

At first, however, what I realized led me into profound disillusionment. Linneman is fantastic and I think her contribution for textual issues is amazing. Linnemann caused a stir in when, due to a conversion experience in November according to her own statement, she renounced the historical-critical methodand asked readers to destroy her previous publications.

For those who know German, you can also find several lectures by Linnemann on various topics on YouTube. I’ll be sure to eeta more about Eta in days to come. Linnemann rejected Markan priority and favored the Linnemabn View of the synoptic gospels. Methodology or Ideology Baker, Richard, I wonder if that is one of the books she suggested should be thrown in the trash.


I’d recommend her book “Historical Criticism of the Linnwmann.

Her life changed dramatically: You can read also read online a transcript of a testimony Linneman gave in at a California church and a scholarly article by Robert W. Thanks for posting this. I have eha it fir linnekann years and went to it yesterday for insight into the parable of the feast Matt 22, Luke 14 which was the USCCB daily gospel reading.

One of Linnemann’s views to find support among conservative English speaking scholarship, notably F.

Eta Linnemann

Josh, Glad you found this helpful. Views Read Edit View history.

I regard everything that I taught and wrote before I entrusted my life to Jesus as refuse. A real proof of that assertion, however, so far as of remains only an echo in Bultmann’s research. In the Introduction to the critique, Linnemann reviews some of her testimony, including how she began to be disillusioned by the historical-critical method and its skeptical approach to Scripture and faith. linnemahn

I was able to recognize sin clearly as sin rather than merely make excuses for it as was my previous habit. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

“Historical-Critical and Evangelical Theology” by Eta Linnemann

Linnemann was a member of the international society Studiorum Novi Testamenti Societas. This interests me as I have studied much of the history of German Higher criticism and am astounded and even over joyed that someone could come out of that fold and become a true believer.

This critique first appeared in German as Wissenschaft oder Meinung? Linne,ann should be read lnnemann discernment given that she apparently became involved with a charismatic, non-confessional church group. In her book “What is credible – the Bible or the Bible criticism” Linnemann claimed inciting an unnamed ear witness, that Rudolf Bultmann on his death bed had recanted his critical views.


Eta Linnemann – Wikipedia

Retrieved from ” https: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Though it appears Linnemann died before turning her attention to a critique of modern lknnemann and translation criticism, one wonders what conclusions she might have reached. Historical Criticism of the Bible: Thomas Three views on the origins of the Lunnemann Gospelsp. Newer Post Older Post Home. My destructive addictions were replaced by a hunger and thirst for his Word and for fellowship with Christians.

I reacted by drifting toward addictions which might dull my misery. This led her to an unswerving commitment to the inspiration and authority of Scripture: Friend or Foe of Scholarship?

In her last years, she broke completely with the theology of her teacher Rudolf Bultmann. Posted by Jeffrey T. I heard about Eta Linnemann for the first time today while listening to this video lecture at a Bible Seminary starting at This page was last edited on 5 Augustat Etw and she taught at the seminar for church service in Berlin-Zehlendorfin she was appointed as Visiting Professor linnenann Braunschweig University of Technology.

I became enslaved to watching television and fell into an increasing state of alcohol dependence p.