API 579-2 PDF

Although every effort has been made to assure the accuracy and reliability of the information that is presented in this standard, API and ASME. API /ASME FFS-2 Fitness-For-Service Example Problem Manual iv. TABLE OF CONTENTS. Special Notes. Home · Standards & Codes; API FITNESS-FOR-SERVICE EXAMPLE PROBLEM MANUAL. API FITNESS-FOR-SERVICE EXAMPLE PROBLEM .

Author: Dusida Zulkisar
Country: Estonia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 14 October 2010
Pages: 106
PDF File Size: 8.54 Mb
ePub File Size: 5.92 Mb
ISBN: 417-9-23211-500-8
Downloads: 68532
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Akikinos

Inspection original fabrication and in-service flaws Maintenance including repairs and replacement Guidelines to make run-repair-replace decisions of in-service equipment are required.

September 03 Monday — September 09 Sunday. Assessment of Components Operating in the Creep Range continued Level 2 assessment Creep, creep-thermal fatigue and corrosion interaction at high temperatures Omega, Larson-Miler and other parametric approaches to creep life assessment Creep and Creep crack growth Module The students should be able to complete by themselves in a confident manner at least Level 2 assessment ; coupled with strong design code knowledge and inspection experience.

Check your email for the Activation Code. Creep Damage – crack-like flaw; creep crack growth; level 2 Practical example: Gouge damage — pipeline; level 1 and level 2 Practical example: We sent a code to.

| balaguru sekar –

Assessment of hydrogen blisters, weld misalignment and shell distortions and Crack-like Flaws – Practical examples Worked example: Inquire Book Now Add to Wishlist. Pressure vessel with crack-like flaw; level 1 Worked example: Enter the activation code here:. Participants will be walked-through the eight-step procedure for conducting an FFS assessment for each damage condition of a component:. Most of times it is applied when inspection findings revealed a condition that may impact the aoi operation of the asset, such as metal loss e.


SpeedyCourse will work better if you enable JavaScript.

FFS Assessment: Alternative cost effective solutions for operating plants

Lamination damage — pressure vessel shell lamination; level 1and level 2 Practical example: The course is aimed at plant inspectors, plant engineers, inspection engineers, and materials and corrosion engineers responsible for managing the integrity of process equipment, piping, boilers and storage tanks. Fatigue damage assessment — remaining life assessment based on operation data and cycle counting; Level 1 Practical example: First Name Last Name.

Description The assessment methods apply to pressure vessels, piping, and tanks that are in service that may contain flaws or have sustained damage. Didn’t receive the activation email? We’ve noticed this is not your region.

Original Scope was evaluation of pressurized equipment in the refinery and petrochemical industry, but then was extended to other industries.

Fundamentals of Fitness for Service

This site also uses cookies to deliver our services. We have detected that JavaScript is appi in your web browser. Repetitorium 2-hour repetitorium of covered modules Exam preparation Final Exam. Assessment of Crack-Like Flaws Part Quantitative engineering evaluation to determine if an in-service equipment is Safe and Reliable to operate at Specific Conditions during a Determined Time.

Your account has been activated.

Assessment of Local Metal loss Part 6: Equipment design basis documentation, including documents that are used to comply with regulatory requirements by establishing that equipment is safe for continued operation Acceptance criteria for future inspections Justification for the deferral of equipment replacement or repair Options for rerating, altering, repairing, or replacing equipment Forecasting remaining useful life of equipment Future inspection requirements Learn Level 1 and Level 2 FFS assessment techniques DURATION: During last years CADE has applied successfully, and deepen his knowledge, in FFS methodology extending his application a;i only to in-service equipment, but also to post-fabrication acceptability, pre-commissioning validation or failure investigation support.


Almost 20 years of work in research and xpi projects, as well as training xpi especially in risk-based inspections for power plants and refining industry. We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website.

Already have an account? Applicable to most types of pressurized equipment, piping and piping systems and storage tanks where flaws and damage or degradation has been detected or identified. Obviously, main benefits of FFS are to grant safe and reliable operation, but also allowing reductions in downtime by eliminating unnecessary repairs, giving extra time to plan shutdown and furthermore reduces eventual costs.

Who Should Attend this course? What do you want to learn today?

Person Led Distance Learner. Assessment of Pitting Corrosion Part 7: Cylindrical pressure vessel with crack-like flaw; level 759-2 and 2 Worked example: Sep 03, – Sep 09, Ampro Solutions Sdn Bhd. The methods covered by FFS are suitable, compatible and in some cases required with and from major inspection codes and standards i.

Fire Damage – Partially fire exposed vessel damage; level 1 Aapi example: Redirect me to my region. Send a new code.